Jeffrey Kelly, Author at Jeff Kelly Law Offices | Page 33 of 40

Jeffrey Kelly

Supreme Court: Exemptions Protect You Only Up To The Value You Claim

In Schwab v. Reilly, the Supreme Court has ruled that bankruptcy debtors are protected only up the value they claim exempt in their bankruptcy petitions.  A divided Supreme Court ruled that bankruptcy debtors do not exempt the full amount of an asset by claiming an exemption equal to the full scheduled value of the asset. 

Supreme Court: Exemptions Protect You Only Up To The Value You Claim Read More »

Chapter 13 – Is There A Difference Between A Garnishment And An EDO?

A Chapter 13 EDO is much different than a state ordered garnishment of your wages.  EDO is an abbreviation for an Employer Deduction Order which is a signed order by a Federal Bankruptcy Judge. In Georgia, the most important difference is the liability for your employer.  Under Georgia State Law, if your employer makes an

Chapter 13 – Is There A Difference Between A Garnishment And An EDO? Read More »

Bankruptcy- Can I Keep My Furniture If I File in Georgia?

As a Georgia bankruptcy attorney, one of the most common questions I hear from potential clients is, “Will I be able to keep my furniture if I file bankruptcy?”  In Georgia, the answer to this question in almost every case is yes. The exemption law in Georgia for furniture states that any bankruptcy debtor may

Bankruptcy- Can I Keep My Furniture If I File in Georgia? Read More »

Getting Divorced During Bankruptcy – What Happens?

Getting divorced during a bankruptcy presents major ethical considerations for your Georgia bankruptcy attorney when a husband and wife file a case together (See Georgia Model Rules of Professional Conduct).  In an individual case, your Georgia bankruptcy attorney may simply need to file amendment reflecting the loss income of the spouse and a new expense

Getting Divorced During Bankruptcy – What Happens? Read More »

Bankruptcy Means Test – Harsh Results Might Be Reduced by Supreme Court Decision

Some of the harsh results of the bankruptcy means test might be reduced by the recent Supreme Court decision in Jan Hamilton, Trustee vs. Stephanie Kay Lanning.  In this case, the Supreme Court has held that bankruptcy judges don’t have to apply a “mechanical approach” to means testing in Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases.  Bankruptcy judges

Bankruptcy Means Test – Harsh Results Might Be Reduced by Supreme Court Decision Read More »